[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090228103958.41fce55b@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:39:58 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Salman Qazi <sqazi@...gle.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, mm: pass in 'total' to __copy_from_user_*nocache()
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:27:59 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> OTOH, given how draconian non-temporal stores are, i'm leaning
> towards removing them from the x86 code altogether. If it matter
> to performance somewhere it can be reintroduced, based on really
> well backed up numbers.
I think that is mostly the right approach; O_DIRECT could be the
exception to that (because there we don't only wipe it from the cpu
cache due to DMA, it even gets wiped from the pagecache!).
But I can see that being too special of a case to care about in the
grand scheme of things (although the database people will now get upset
with me ;-)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists