[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440902281240i11423a95l98e330768ac6ca18@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:40:08 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: brk patches..
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> wonder if boot loader check uncompress size aka vmlinux size in bzImage
>>> before it find one good position for bzImage...?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Jeremy's brk patches may break:
>> 1. kexec load 64bit vmlinux on some ram that near the memory hole etc.
>> blindly to use ram after _end may have some problem
>> 2. coreboot aka linux is using elf (by mkelfImage : vmlinux + initrd),
>> initrd became one section after _end...
>> could cause initrd get overwrite... by extend _brk
>>
>
> But its no different from what i386 does now to allocate its initial
> pagetables. How does this not break now?
>
it will try to use initial page table af first, and it is not big
enough, it will according to e820 and other reserved_early areas to
find good positions.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists