[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090228235526.GA6023@shadowen.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:55:26 +0000
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: mike@...pulab.co.il, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: checkpatch --file warns about p0 patch
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 03:04:05PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:43:12 +0000
> Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> > Hmm, that should already be fixed in the version Andrew Morton has.
>
> Hmm, all of these:
>
> checkpatch-make-in_atomic-ok-in-the-core.patch
> checkpatch-do-not-warn-about-p0-patches-when-checking-files.patch
> checkpatch-correctly-handle-type-spacing-in-the-face-of-modifiers.patch
> checkpatch-pointer-type-star-may-have-modifiers-following.patch
> checkpatch-a-modifier-is-not-an-identifier-at-the-end-of-a-type.patch
> checkpatch-extend-attribute-testing-to-all-modifiers.patch
> checkpatch-add-__ref-as-a-sparse-modifier.patch
> checkpatch-version-028.patch
>
> apart from perhaps checkpatch-add-__ref-as-a-sparse-modifier.patch look
> like bugfixes. So I suppose we should slip them into 2.6.29, yes?
Yes those are all bugfixes. If we can get them in that would be good.
-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists