[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902271631231.3111@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:39:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] vsprintf: unify the format decoding layer for its
3 users
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> Ok, here is a try, I've mostly unified the format decoding bits.
> Most interesting other helpers were already implemented (pointer(),
> string() and number()
Ok, I don't think this is beautiful, but neither was the original code,
so..
However, in order to make it at least a _bit_ more palatable, could we
please agree to at least clean up this:
> +static int format_decode(const char *fmt, enum format_type *type, int *flags,
> + int *field_width, int *base, int *precision,
> + int *qualifier)
To
struct printf_spec {
enum format_type type;
int flags, field_width, base, precision, qualifier;
};
and then pass things around like
static int format_decode(const char *fmt, struct printf_spec *spec)
{
..
instead? Wouldn't that be nicer? I suspect it would make the code look
nicer too (instead of doing "*base = x", you'd see "spec->base = x" and it
would look less like line noise in the callee, an the caller could just
do a single "struct format_spec spec = { 0, }" to initialize that thing).
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists