[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090227183949.90f231e6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:39:49 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: me@...ipebalbi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, felipe.balbi@...ia.com,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, sameo@...nedhand.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: lockdep and threaded IRQs (was: ...)
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:30:36 -0800 David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
> > ah, OK, twl4030_i2c_read_u8() does i2c I/O.
> >
> > Can't do that.
>
> Threaded IRQ handlers *can* do that. That's the point.
>
> Now, if you were to say "keep waiting a few more years
> until some threaded IRQ framework finally merges" ...
> the question comes up, "What to do in the meanwhile".
> (Ditto, "well, we've been waiting a long time now to
> see those threaded IRQs, what's up with them?")
I don't have a clue what you're talking about. Where is this "threaded
irq handler" implementation of which you speak? File and line?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists