[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090227200805.23d27aa1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:08:05 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>
Cc: roel.kluin@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, y-goto@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: get_nid_for_pfn() returns int
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:02:00 -0800 Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > Should it unlinger? I have it in the 2.6.30 pile.
> > >
> > > Yes, that would be good. :)
> >
> > What would be good? Your answer is ambiguous.
>
> Sorry, I was just trying to agree that your plan to wait
> until 2.6.30 works for me. Unless someone else objects
> leave it in your 2.6.30 pile.
I object ;)
The change is obviously correct, let's merge it now.
This could cause presently-working systems to stop working due to
hitherto-undiscovered bugs. If so, sue me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists