[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2ab85nw28.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:42:55 +0100
From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@...il.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Question regarding concurrent accesses through block device and fs
[ Sorry for being long to answer but I was off, I'm slow and there are
a lot of complex code to dig out ! ]
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> writes:
> On Saturday 21 February 2009 01:10:24 Francis Moreau wrote:
[...]
>> - looking at unmap_underlying_metadata(), there's no code to deal with
>> meta data buffers. It gets the buffer and unmap it whatever the type of
>> data it contains.
>
> That's why I say it only really works for buffer cache used by the same
> filesystem that is now known to be unused.
>
hum, I still don't know what you mean by this, sorry to be slow.
[...]
>> What am I missing ?
>
> That we might complete the write of the new buffer before the
> old buffer is finished writing out?
Ah yes actually I realize that I don't know where and when the inode
blocks are effectively written to the disk !
It seems that write_inode(), called after data are commited to the
disk, only marks the inode buffers as dirty but it performs no IO (at
least it looks so for ext2 when its 'do_sync' parameter is 0 which is
the case when this method is called by write_inode()).
Could you enlight me one more time ?
Thanks
--
Francis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists