[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49AAEC6D.9000200@krogh.cc>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:13:33 +0100
From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>
To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29-rc6
john stultz wrote:
>> Working (clocksource=tsc) 2.6.26.8
>> jk@...d03:~$ ntpdc -c kerninfo
>> pll offset: 0.003208 s
>> pll frequency: -25.070 ppm
> [snip]
>> Non-working (clocksource=tsc) 2.6.29-rc6
>> jk@...d12:~$ ntpdc -c kerninfo
>> pll offset: 0 s
>> pll frequency: -34.754 ppm
>
>
> Ok, so it seems ntp hasn't really had a chance to settle down, its only
> made a 10ppm adjustment so far. NTPd will stop corrections at ~
> +/-500ppm, so you're not at that bound yet, where things would be really
> broken.
But I should settle within a "reasonable" period of time? (not hours?).
> If the affected kernel isn't resetting in the logs anymore, I'd be
> interested in what the new ppm value is.
I keeps resetting after 7 hours .. Is there more information I can
provide?
Jesper
--
Jesper
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists