lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:38:37 -0800
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <>
To:	Andi Kleen <>
CC:	Jody Belka <>,
	Nick Piggin <>,
	Xen-devel <>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <>,
	Andrew Morton <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: core dom0 support

Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jody Belka <> writes:
>> Is it duplication though? I personally have machines with older processors
>> that don't have hvm support. I plan on keeping these around for a good amount
>> of time, and would love to be running them on mainline. So for me, unless KVM
>> is somehow going to support para-virtualisation, this isn't duplication.
> The old systems will continue to run fine with a 2.6.18 Dom0 though.

But that suggests the *only* reason to update kernels is to get new 
hardware support.  Or conversely, we should stop trying to be backwards 
compatible with old hardware in new kernels because there's no reason to 
keep it.

While a lot of the delta between 2.6.18 has been hardware support 
updates, there have been a lot of other useful things: a new CPU 
scheduler, tickless operation (which directly important for 
virtualization), all the cgroups stuff, new filesystems, IO schedulers, 
etc, etc.  All good things to have, even on older hardware.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists