lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:28:58 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <>
To:	Andi Kleen <>
CC:	David Miller <>,,,,,,,
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, mm: pass in 'total' to __copy_from_user_*nocache()

Andi Kleen wrote:
>> I think this is an accurate analysis as well, it's really unfortunate
>> the non-temporal stuff on x86 doesn't preserve existing cache lines
>> when present.
>> I thought that was the whole point.  Don't pollute the caches, but
>> if cache lines are already loaded there, use them and don't purge!
> x86 actually supports that, it's just not done through movnt.
> You can do that on x86 by using PREFETCHNTA (or T0/T1/T2 for specific
> cache levels). Typically this is implemented by forcing the cache line 
> to only a single way of the cache (so only using max 1/8 or so of your last 
> level cache) 
> I'm not sure how it interacts with REP MOVS* though, this internally
> tends to do additional magic for larger copies.

The PREFETCHNTA stuff is really for reads rather than writes, however.
Yes, you can prefetch the cache line you're about to overwrite, but I
suspect (I haven't verified) that you lose out on whole-line
optimizations that way.


H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists