linux-kernel - Re: [osd-dev] [PATCH 1/8] exofs: Kbuild, Headers and osd utils

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49AA66CE.7080506@panasas.com>
Date:	Sun, 01 Mar 2009 12:43:26 +0200
From:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
CC:	James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	jeff@...zik.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avishay@...il.com,
	osd-dev@...n-osd.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [osd-dev] [PATCH 1/8] exofs: Kbuild, Headers and osd utils

FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:10:15 +0200
> Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:
> 
>> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>>> Can you stop the argument, "exofs is similar to the existing
>>> traditional file systems hence it should be treated equally". It's
>>> simply untrue. Does anyone except for panasas people insist the same
>>> argument?
>>>
>> No I will not, it is true. exofs is just a regular old filesystem
>> nothing different.
> 
> After reading this, I gave up discussing this issue with you but I
> still wait for your fixes that you promised:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=123445759718253&w=2
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> --

They are on the way, I have not forgotten

Boaz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/