[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49ABD05C.3010906@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:26:04 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: core dom0 support
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com> wrote:
>> The current, out-of-tree xen kernel stuff is based on 2.6.18.
>> [...]
>
> Sure, but what i'm pointing out is the following aspect of
> communication:
>
>>>> [...] At the moment its all running on massive out-of-tree
>>>> patches, which doesn't make anyone happy. It's best that it
>>>> be in the mainline kernel. You know, like we argue for
>>>> everything else.
>
> Comparing it to a 2.6.18 base is simply misleading when it comes
> to upstreaming something. Enterprise distros will rebase, and
> their out-of-tree pile of patches will shrink.
I think Jeremy refers to the 2.6.18 kernel though. And IMHO it isn't
misleading as this is the only option for a dom0 kernel. Well, was
until very recently, now you can also run the latest pv_ops bits with
dom0 support. That is still very young code though and I wouldn't use
that (yet) for production systems. Works fine on my development box though.
The bits needed for pv_ops based dom0 support in arch/x86 is small
compared to what is already there for domU support.
cheers,
Gerd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists