linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq: remove IRQF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090302144303.GA30136@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:43:03 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq: remove IRQF_DISABLED


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> Hi Linus,
> 
> Would you be willing to take such a patch?
> 
> Its a rather big one, but if you think its a good idea, I can 
> generate one against whatever tree is needed.
> 
> Provided I didn't break any !genirq stuff.. then again, that 
> might be a nice incentive to fix up those last few archs.

look good IMO. If there are no objections, and given that it 
modifies half a thousand of files i'd suggest we do this near 
the end of the merge window and not carry it in the genirq tree 
- while trivial it will still generate quite a bit of conflicts. 
Would that work with you?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/