[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090302082003.1bb7bdc5@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:20:03 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Andreas Robinson <andr345@...il.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, sam@...nborg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] module, kbuild: Faster boot with custom kernel.
> A monolithic kernel with parallelized initcalls is better - about 200
> ms faster than parallel insmods on my test system. However, it comes
> with a fairly large set of changes:
>
> * First, you need a 200-line patch in init/main.c (do_initcalls() and
> friends)
why?
We already have async function calls; and those speed up my boot (when
enabled) significantly, by doing much of the kernel/driver init in
parallel.
My server box boots the whole kernel (including all drivers; I build
verything in) in 0.56 seconds, and my net books do it in around 1.0
seconds.
>
> * Then the built-in module dependencies must be calculated properly,
> eg with a modified depmod, and added to the build process.
nope not if done right
> So, what do you think, should I keep going? IMHO, the slower userspace
> implementation is acceptable since it's so much simpler.
I would strongly suggest that you turn on the async function calls and
look at the boot graph of the resulting kernel boot... if you send
that to me I can also take a look and make suggestions....
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists