[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1236014911.18284.89.camel@penberg-laptop>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:28:31 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Thiago Galesi <thiagogalesi@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crc32: remove useless __pure modifier from functions
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 12:50 -0300, Thiago Galesi wrote:
> Actually, the effects of most keywords (like const, etc) affect things
> outside of the module (the callers)
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.2.0/gcc/Function-Attributes.html
> has a good explanation.
>
> Briefly, a _pure function only depends on its parameters and the only
> return is via the function return, so the compiler can optimize some
> of its calls away.
Hmm. They're not marked as pure in the header files. Does GCC look it up
from the object file or something for this...?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists