[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1236016611.5330.971.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:56:51 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq: remove IRQF_DISABLED
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 09:11 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
<story about how PIO IDE sucks>
> So this is not as simple as your patch. Not even _nearly_.
Yuckness, yes that does complicate matters significantly.
That leaves us trying to find all request_irq() invocations that do not
have IRQF_DISABLED.. /me puts it on the todo list.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists