[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1236017249.5330.1011.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:07:28 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq: remove IRQF_DISABLED
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 18:55 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Could we make just the IDE driver itself enable interrupts? Sure. But that
>
> Actually it has been doing it for years (some host drivers don't do this by
> default and still need "hdparm -u" or equivalent but I was planning to change
> it for 2.6.30).
What does it use to do that? A local_irq_enable() in hardirq context
will make lockdep yell bloody murder :-).
Then there is local_irq_enable_in_hardirq(), which plain simply lies
when lockdep is enabled -- IOW it would generate horrid irq latencies.
Not having to deal with IRQ recursion in lockdep helps.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists