[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090302210158.GA18479@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 21:01:58 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq: remove IRQF_DISABLED
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 04:59:48PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The idea is to mandate IRQF_DISABLED for everybody, and since it doesn't
> do any good to have it a flag if you have it always enabled, remove
> it ;-)
Bad. Very bad.
So, when I use PIO IDE on embedded platforms, I have to have all other
interrupts locked out for things like serial ports, network interfaces
with small packet buffers, etc and I can't specify IRQF_DISABLE on
such network interfaces anymore?
No, this is a step backwards. Please don't go there.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists