linux-kernel - Re: [TIP,regression,i915] /dev/dri/card0 is no longer present

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Mar 2009 23:11:43 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Cc:	Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>,
	"dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" <dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [TIP,regression,i915] /dev/dri/card0 is no longer present


* Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 13:34 -0800, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 05:48 -0800, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 12:39:48PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks, i've reverted the commit for now. Could you please send
> > > > > a 'dmesg' from the bootup with the failed driver? By all
> > > > > likelyhood an ioremap failure causes a driver failure.
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > See below (drm says it initalized though...):
> > > > 
> > > > [    0.000000] Linux version 2.6.29-rc6-00006-g17581ad (@verona) (gcc version 4.2.4) #87 Sun Mar 1 13:42:28 GMT 2009
> > > > [    0.000000] KERNEL supported cpus:
> > > > [    0.000000]   Intel GenuineIntel
> > > > [    0.000000] PAT WC disabled due to known CPU erratum.
> > > 
> > > Looks like PAT is getting disabled on this platform. Can you 
> > > send the output of /proc/cpuinfo please.
> > 
> > Does this mean we failed an ioremap()? We still should not fail 
> > a device ioremap _ever_. We should just fall back to UC and be 
> > done with it. We may emit a warning if we consider it 
> > troublesome, but we should never ever break working drivers 
> > really.
> > 
> 
> No. We don't break ioremap. We try to fallback on UC_MINUS 
> here. But, there is something wrong happening in that path, 
> that is resulting in this issue. I am looking at that right 
> now.

ah, ok.

> I have found another problem with this particular patch, on 
> one of test systems. So, let us keep the revert until I fix 
> what looks like two different problems here.

ok.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/