linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix e820 end address with EFI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86802c440903011851t17e240eu9dc25116a40ca85e@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 1 Mar 2009 18:51:32 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:	Brian Maly <bmaly@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix e820 end address with EFI

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
>> so 64bit could use ioremap_cache() too?
>> we may keep 32bit and 64bit a bit consistent.
>
> If we use ioremap_cache(), kexec runtime service will not work in kexec
> situation, which needs EFI runtime memory area to be mapped at exact
> same location across kexec. I think we should support kexec if possible.


sure.

please don't touch max_low_pfn_mapped, because some range may not
directly mapped under those efi run-time code

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/