[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090302235327.GB19084@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 00:53:27 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, me@...ipebalbi.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
felipe.balbi@...ia.com, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
sameo@...nedhand.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: lockdep and threaded IRQs (was: ...)
* David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
> On Monday 02 March 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > If you want to work on genirq threaded IRQ handlers them please
> > check out and test the threaded IRQ handlers patches that are
> > being worked on at lkml. See:
> >
> > [patch 0/4] genirq: add infrastructure for threaded interrupt handlers V2
>
> I did check them out, as noted earlier in this thread.
>
> The significant omission is lack of support for chaining
> such threads. Example, an I2C device that exposes
> several dozen IRQs with mask/ack/... operations that
> require I2C access.
Well, those are rarely used, embedded-only constructs - the main
focus of IRQ threading patches are the more common patterns.
Since you care about them - could you please send patches on top
of the IRQ threading patches to add support for them?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists