[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090302041148.GA7410@in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:41:48 +0530
From: Ankita Garg <ankita@...ibm.com>
To: Frank Seidel <fseidel@...e.de>
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Frank Seidel <frank@...eidel.de>, kernalert.de@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: reduce stack size
Hi Frank,
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 09:00:14PM +0100, Frank Seidel wrote:
> From: Frank Seidel <frank@...eidel.de>
>
> Reduce stack memory footprint of lkdtm
> (recursive_loop). From 1024 bytes on i386 down
> to <10.
>
The intention here is infact to trigger a stack overflow. This module is
used to test kernel dumping mechanism like kdump. So the expectation is
that the kernel will dump as soon as the stack overflows.
> Signed-off-by: Frank Seidel <frank@...eidel.de>
> ---
> drivers/misc/lkdtm.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.c
> @@ -225,14 +225,24 @@ static int lkdtm_parse_commandline(void)
>
> static int recursive_loop(int a)
> {
> - char buf[1024];
> + char *buf;
> + int ret;
> +
> + buf = kmalloc(1024, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buf) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "lkdtm : couldn't allocate buffer\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> memset(buf,0xFF,1024);
> recur_count--;
> if (!recur_count)
> - return 0;
> + ret = 0;
> else
> - return recursive_loop(a);
> + ret = recursive_loop(a);
> +
> + kfree(buf);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> void lkdtm_handler(void)
--
Regards,
Ankita Garg (ankita@...ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM India Systems & Technology Labs,
Bangalore, India
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists