[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49AB648B.5090302@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:46:03 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, sqazi@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, mm: pass in 'total' to __copy_from_user_*nocache()
Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> I would expect any high performance CPU these days to combine entries
> in the store queue, even for normal store instructions (especially for
> linear memcpy patterns). Isn't this likely to be the case?
>
Actually, that is often not the case simply because it doesn't buy that
much. The big win comes when you don't read a whole cache line in from
memory, but that is a property of the cache, not the store queue.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists