| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200903041057.34072.M4rkusXXL@web.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:57:33 +0100
From: Markus <M4rkusXXL@....de>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: drop_caches ...
Hello!
I have a small problem. Maybe its just a misunderstanding but I cant
solve it.
I think that writing "3" to drop_caches should drop all buffers and
caches which are already written. So its recommended to put a "sync"
infront of it.
So I did "free -m ; sync ; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches ; free -m"
And it gave me:
total used free shared buffers
cached
Mem: 3950 3922 28 0 1
879
-/+ buffers/cache: 3041 909
Swap: 5342 205 5136
total used free shared buffers
cached
Mem: 3950 3907 43 0 0
864
-/+ buffers/cache: 3041 908
Swap: 5341 206 5135
So the buffer was 1 and is 0 afterthat. But cached is at 879 MB before
and is still 864 MB (!!!) after that!
I am at swappiness=0 and when I remove and readd one swap-partition
after another (so there is always swap). It will keep the cached and
put the swapped memory on other swaps?!
I _think_ thats not the way it should go?
It would be really kind if someone could explain that issue and
what "cached" is at all!
Have a nice day...
Markus
PS: Please CC me as I am not subscribed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists