linux-kernel - Re: Large amount of scsi-sgpool objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090304111235.GA14593@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:12:35 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Large amount of scsi-sgpool objects


* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:

> Stefan,
> 
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > As I said, I recommend that people do not receive those off-topic
> > patches by default, only on demand.  (Because I sometimes work with -rt
> > users.)
> 
> And as I said before, I missed to remove the patch before pushing out
> the -rt tree. So I really do not need repeated advise on how to do my
> work.

yeah. I dont think Stefan ever maintained a high-volume generic 
tree before. Kibitzing from the sidelines always makes it seem 
so easy ;-)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/