lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49AE65FF.2060309@atmel.com>
Date:	Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:29:03 +0100
From:	Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@...el.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hcegtvedt@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] WM97xx updates

Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:26:07AM +0100, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
> 
>> The only thing catched by review was a leaking irq line, do you plan to  
>> fixup that Mark?
> 
> Jiri also had some further comments from the initial posting (mail
> attached).  I can probably try to fix up most things blind but I'll need
> to at least set up an at32 toolchain to build test.  The workqueue thing
> might be better to test on hardware, though, just in case there's some
> noticable performance impact.  I wouldn't expect so but it'd be safer.
> 

I'll see what I can manage to squeeze in of testing, there is always the 
in-between-time.

What is this patch based against? Linus tree, master branch?

-- 
Best regards,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ