linux-kernel - Re: x86-tip: cpufreq breakage - bisection fingers 89c9215165ca609096e845926d9a18f1306176a4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1236168809.14171.9.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date:	Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:13:29 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86-tip: cpufreq breakage -
	bisection	fingers	89c9215165ca609096e845926d9a18f1306176a4

On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 18:38 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:

> I wonder what is going on.  I'll try again with
> 89c9215165ca609096e845926d9a18f1306176a4.  Argh... weird.

marge:/ # modprobe processor
FATAL: Error inserting processor (/lib/modules/2.6.29-tip-smp/kernel/drivers/acpi/processor.ko): Invalid module format

I've got 80 _other_ modules loaded/working just fine, only the cpufreq
stuff won't play ball.

I re-installed binutils/gcc/modutils, checked my repo via git fsck and
rebuilt from scratch, and the problem remains.  That very same module
loads and cpufreq works just peachy with the hacklet I posted.

Yup, pretty weird.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/