[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090304134705.7d9bbe5c@i1501.lan.towertech.it>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:47:05 +0100
From: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
To: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Cc: Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Zidlicky <rz@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Generic RTC class driver
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:26:29 +0100 (CET)
Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com> wrote:
> Thanks Paul, I wasn't aware of that thread!
>
> Yes, this is almost the same. The only part I don't agree with is the move of
> the creation of the platform device from arch-specific code to rtc-firmware.c,
> as this makes autoloading the driver more difficult.
and it's also against a proper implementation of the device/driver model.
> Seems like everybody but the RTC maintainer has an interest in having an RTC
> class driver on top of [gs]et_rtc_time()... ;-)
That's because everyone is lazy :)
Seriously, if you want to handle it in the way we wrote
in the previous emails, it's ok for me.
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists