lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090304155251.GA11741@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:52:51 -0600
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ipc namespace: initialize init_ipc_ns.count to 1

Hi Andrew,

when I sent an earlier version of the posix mqueue namespaces patchset
you called me on setting init_ipc_ns.count to 2.  The following patch
changes that to 1.  This is safe because the 1-count is for swapper, who
cannot unshare the namespace.  Having init do unshare(CLONE_NEWIPC) only
drops the count to 1.  No pre-init resources other than tasks pin (and
therefore can decrease the refcount on) an ipc_ns.

Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
---
 ipc/msgutil.c |    3 +--
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ipc/msgutil.c b/ipc/msgutil.c
index e5d6da1..f095ee2 100644
--- a/ipc/msgutil.c
+++ b/ipc/msgutil.c
@@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mq_lock);
  * and not CONFIG_IPC_NS.
  */
 struct ipc_namespace init_ipc_ns = {
-	/* It's not for this patch to change, but should this be 1? */
-	.count		= ATOMIC_INIT(2),
+	.count		= ATOMIC_INIT(1),
 #ifdef CONFIG_POSIX_MQUEUE
 	.mq_queues_max   = DFLT_QUEUESMAX,
 	.mq_msg_max      = DFLT_MSGMAX,
-- 
1.5.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ