linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix DMI for EFI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090304175418.GB29823@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:54:18 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Brian Maly <bmaly@...hat.com>
Cc:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ying.huang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix DMI for EFI


* Brian Maly <bmaly@...hat.com> wrote:

>
>
>> Hm, could we ever find ourselves in the positition of having to access 
>> the DMI strings table in the EFI init code, to implement a quirk? I 
>> think that's quite plausible.
>
>> OTOH, with some DMI quirks in EFI tables it's a bit of a chicken and 
>> egg problem. Can DMI strings ever be outside of EFI tables on EFI 
>> systems?
>
>> 	Ingo
>
> Right now it is EFI that loads the dmi tables (and all other 
> tables such as ACPI), so it is a chicken and the egg. I think 
> that if dmi is ever needed by EFI, the dmi scan will have to 
> be moved inside efi_init. We could move the dmi scan into 
> efi_init and do the dmi scan the moment we have the dmi table. 
> Thats really the soonest point we could scan on EFI systems. 
> Im OK with moving dmi to efi_init if you prefer.

Your patch looks fine, but i'd like to hear the opinion of Ying 
Huang as well.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/