[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49AED7A7.9030304@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:33:59 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: core dom0 support
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> In particular, Xen is a microkernel-type operating system. The dom0
> model is a classic single-server, in the style of Mach. A lot of the
> "Xen could use a distributed dom0" arguments were also done with Mach
> ("the real goal is a multi-server") but such a system never
> materialized (Hurd was supposed to be one.) Building multiservers is
> *hard*, and building multiservers which don't suck is even harder.
A lot of the core Xen concepts (domains, event channels, etc.) were
present in the Nemesis[1] exo-kernel project.
Two other interest papers on the subject "Are virtual machine monitors
microkernels done right?"[2] from the Xen folks and a rebuttal from the
l4ka group[3].
[1] http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/srg/netos/old-projects/nemesis/
[2] http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1251124
[3] http://l4ka.org/publications/paper.php?docid=2189
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> -hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists