linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] c/r: Add CR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090304135314.618ad07e@thinkcentre.lan>
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:53:14 -0600
From:	Nathan Lynch <ntl@...ox.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] c/r: Add CR_COPY() macro (v3)

On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:00:37 -0800
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 16:57 -0800, Dan Smith wrote:
> > DH> Did you convince Nathan that this ends up being a good idea?
> > 
> > Technically he hasn't seen this version, but my hopes are not high
> > that he will change his mind.  If the feedback is that they're not
> > liked, I'll happily remove them.
> 
> I just figure if Nathan feels that strongly that we'll encounter more
> people who feel even more so.  So, I was curious if he changed his mind
> somehow.

No, not really, sorry.

I understand why it's nice for the developer to have this sort of
helper, but I don't think it's nice for someone trying to review or
debug the code.

Surely discussing these macros has already consumed more developer time
than they would ever save?  :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/