linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] lis3: solve dependency between core and ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 2009 02:43:50 +0100
From:	Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
To:	Éric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] lis3: solve dependency between core and ACPI

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:54:50PM +0100, Éric Piel wrote:
> Daniel Mack schreef:
> > This solves the dependency between lis3lv02d.[ch] and ACPI specific
> > methods. It introduces a ->bus_priv pointer to the device struct which
> > is casted to 'struct acpi_device' in the ACIP layer. Changed hp_accel.c
> > accordingly.
> > 
> > This also moves the read_8() and read_16() routines from hp_accel.c to
> > lis3lv02d.c as they are not specific to ACPI.
> Hello,
> I've tried the patch series on my laptop. This particular patch burst
> the driver... need some work :-) The values are not read correctly and
> the IRQ is not detected. See down in the code...

Ok, obvious fixes. I'll post a new set of the three topmost patches -
could you test them again, please?

Thanks and best regards,
Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/