[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18863.1197.527693.75146@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:46:05 +1100
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] perfcounters: provide expansion room in the ABI
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/perfcounters.git rfc
> >
> > include/linux/perf_counter.h | 12 +++++++++---
> > include/linux/syscalls.h | 2 +-
> > kernel/perf_counter.c | 10 +++++++---
> > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Pulled into tip:perfcounters/core, thanks Paul!
Actually, I goofed slightly. In this bit of the patch:
@@ -80,10 +81,15 @@ struct perf_counter_hw_event {
exclude_user : 1, /* don't count user */
exclude_kernel : 1, /* ditto kernel */
exclude_hv : 1, /* ditto hypervisor */
+ exclude_idle : 1, /* don't count when idle */
- __reserved_1 : 23;
+ __reserved_1 : 55;
+
the 55 should have been 54 if we want those bitfields to occupy 64
bits. With 55 there, __reserved_1 will go in the next 64-bit
quadword (x86-speak, or doubleword in powerpc-speak).
Do you think that's worth changing? If so I'll do a commit changing
the 55 to 54.
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists