[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090304042920.GA4508@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:59:20 +0530
From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH mmotm] cgroup: remove rcu_read_lock() from css_get_next()
cgroup: remove rcu_read_lock() from css_get_next()
Callers of css_get_next() are already calling css_get_next()
under rcu_read_lock() and hence there there is no need for
css_get_next() to re-acquire rcu_read_lock(). As per the
comments in css_get_next(), let the callers accquire the
rcu_read_lock().
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/cgroup.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -3553,7 +3553,6 @@ css_get_next(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, i
return NULL;
BUG_ON(!ss->use_id);
- rcu_read_lock();
/* fill start point for scan */
tmpid = id;
while (1) {
@@ -3577,8 +3576,6 @@ css_get_next(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, i
/* continue to scan from next id */
tmpid = tmpid + 1;
}
-
- rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
Regards,
Bharata.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists