[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49AF87D6.5040104@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:05:42 +0100
From: Frank Blaschka <blaschka@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, bart@...ie.net,
greearb@...delatech.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
dada1@...mosbay.com, frank.blaschka@...ibm.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.29-rc* QinQ vlan trunking regression
Hi Dave, Patrick,
sorry I could not follow the complete discussion of the fixes done for this problem
but does
if (netif_device_present(real_dev) && ops->ndo_neigh_setup)
- err = ops->ndo_neigh_setup(dev, pa);
+ err = ops->ndo_neigh_setup(real_dev, pa);
not change the idea of the neigh_setup? Remind we want the neigh_setup of the
real device as the neigh setup function for the vlan device.
Frank
Patrick McHardy schrieb:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>>> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:12:50 +0100
>>>
>>>>> We probably need both fixes to cover everything.
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, just the second one still crashes. I'm about to retry using both.
>>>
>>> Here is the updated version just for the record:
>>>
>>> vlan: Fix vlan-in-vlan crashes.
>>
>> This still crashes. I'll have another look at the code.
>
> This one combined with your patch fixes the crash. The code was calling
> vlan_dev_neigh_setup recursively.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>
> (or Tested-by: in case you want to roll it into your patch).
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists