[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49AF96BE.1020302@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:09:18 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: blaschka@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, bart@...ie.net,
greearb@...delatech.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
dada1@...mosbay.com, frank.blaschka@...ibm.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.29-rc* QinQ vlan trunking regression
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Yes, but that patch introduced the requirement to pass the correct
> device down since now the handlers need it to get to the ops of the
> underlying device. Previously they all relied on the handlers not
> using their private data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>
Oops, the last patch was broken.
View attachment "x" of type "text/plain" (522 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists