lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200903051543.22516.M4rkusXXL@web.de>
Date:	Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:43:22 +0100
From:	Markus <M4rkusXXL@....de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@...hat.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@....muni.cz>
Subject: Re: drop_caches ...

> > > Could you please try the attached patch which will also show the
> > > user and process that opened these files? It adds three more 
fields
> > > when CONFIG_PROC_FILECACHE_EXTRAS is selected.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Fengguang
> > >  
> > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:55:35PM +0200, Markus wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > # sort -n -k 3 filecache-2009-03-05 | tail -n 5
> > > >      15886       7112     7112     100      1    d- 00:08
> > > > (tmpfs)        /dev/zero\040(deleted)
> > > >      16209      35708    35708     100      1    d- 00:08
> > > > (tmpfs)        /dev/zero\040(deleted)
> > > >      16212      82128    82128     100      1    d- 00:08
> > > > (tmpfs)        /dev/zero\040(deleted)
> > > >      15887     340024   340024     100      1    d- 00:08
> > > > (tmpfs)        /dev/zero\040(deleted)
> > > >      15884     455008   455008     100      1    d- 00:08
> > > > (tmpfs)        /dev/zero\040(deleted)
> > > > 
> > > > The sum of the third column is 1013 MB.
> > > > To note the biggest ones (or do you want the whole file?)... and 
> > thats 
> > > > after a sync and a drop_caches! (Can be seen in the commands 
given.)
> > 
> > I could, but I know where these things belong to. Its from sphinx (a 
> > mysql indexer) searchd. It loads parts of the index into memory.
> > The sizes looked well-known and killing the searchd will 
reduce "cached" 
> > to a normal amount ;)
> 
> And it's weird about the file name: /dev/zero.  I wonder how it
> managed to create that file, and then delete it, inside a tmpfs!

I dont know exactly. But in the source its just a:
... mmap ( NULL, m_iLength, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | 
MAP_ANON, -1, 0 );
Perhaps thats the way shared anonymous memory is handled?!


> Just out of curiosity, are they shm objects? Can you show us the
> output of 'df'? In your convenient time.

Thats all:
# df -h
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md6               14G  7.9G  5.9G  58% /
udev                   10M  304K  9.8M   3% /dev
cachedir              4.0M  100K  4.0M   3% /lib64/splash/cache
/dev/md4               19G   15G  3.2G  82% /home
/dev/md3              8.3G  4.5G  3.8G  55% /usr/portage
shm                   2.0G     0  2.0G   0% /dev/shm


> > I just dont know why its in "cached" (can that be swapped out btw?).
> > But I think thats not a problem of the kernel, but of anonymous 
> > mmap-ing.
> 
> You know, because the file is created in tmpfs, which is swap-backed.
> By definition the pages here cannot be dropped by third-party.

Hm, ok.


> > I think its resolved, thanks to everybody and Fengguang in 
particular!
> 
> You are welcome :-)
;)

Have a nice day.
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ