[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1236264418.4261.91.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:46:58 +0200
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...ia.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rohit Hagargundgi <h.rohit@...sung.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [MTD] Flex-OneNAND support
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 15:38 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > My point is: for what purpose was EUNCLEAN created by whoever created
> > it and, given that, is its use by MTD appropriate? Because it does
> > appear that this gets returned all the way to userspace sometimes.
>
> I have had a look at the use of EUCLEAN and found the following:
> 1. It does not seem to be defined in POSIX
> 2. It may have been used by unix variants to indicate an
> attempt to mount a file system whose superblock was not marked
> as clean.
> 3. In Linux, it is used almost exclusively by MTD, with
> one exception in smbfs, from which it is tempting to conclude that
> smbfs (at least) is using it incorrectly. There is one web page
> http://www.wlug.org.nz/EUCLEAN where the author suggests ENOMEDIUM
> might be a better choice.
>
> Can you point me to where EUCLEAN is returned to userspace? I took
> a quick look and couldn't see it.
But for us, EUCLEAN looks like a good name :-) Probably this is why
tglx choose this error code.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists