[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090305163913.E59C59BB@kernel>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:39:13 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 11/11] optimize c/r check in dup_fd()
__scan_files_for_cr() should compile down to nothing
if checkpoint/restart is disabled.
But, I think the spinlocks in fcheck_files() keep
the compiler from figuring this out. So, instead
if putting in some #ifdefs, use our new cr_enabled()
helper.
I've verified that this puts .text size back to
where it was without the __scan_files_for_cr() call.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
linux-2.6.git-dave/fs/file.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff -puN fs/file.c~optimize-cr-checkk fs/file.c
--- linux-2.6.git/fs/file.c~optimize-cr-checkk 2009-03-05 08:37:05.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.git-dave/fs/file.c 2009-03-05 08:37:05.000000000 -0800
@@ -290,6 +290,9 @@ static void __scan_files_for_cr(struct f
{
int i;
+ if (!cr_enabled())
+ return;
+
for (i = 0; i < files->fdtab.max_fds; i++) {
struct file *f = fcheck_files(files, i);
if (!f)
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists