linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] atomic highmem kmap page pinning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090305092534.740ee3c9.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop>
Date:	Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:25:34 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...e.de>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] atomic highmem kmap page pinning

On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 23:46:33 +0000
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 08:07:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:26:00 -0500 (EST)
> > Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:58:13 -0500 (EST)
> > > > Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > I've implemented highmem for ARM.  Yes, some ARM machines do have lots 
> > > > > of memory...
> > > > > 
> > > > > The problem is that most ARM machines have a non IO coherent cache, 
> > > > > meaning that the dma_map_* set of functions must clean and/or invalidate 
> > > > > the affected memory manually.  And because the majority of those 
> > > > > machines have a VIVT cache, the cache maintenance operations must be 
> > > > > performed using virtual addresses.
> > > > > 
> > > > > In dma_map_page(), an highmem pages could still be mapped and cached 
> > > > > even after kunmap() was called on it.  As long as highmem pages are 
> > > > > mapped, page_address(page) is non null and we can use that to 
> > > > > synchronize the cache.
> > > > > It is unlikely but still possible for kmap() to race and recycle the 
> > > > > obtained virtual address above, and use it for another page though.  In 
> > > > > that case, the new mapping could end up with dirty cache lines for 
> > > > > another page, and the unsuspecting cache invalidation loop in 
> > > > > dma_map_page() won't notice resulting in data loss.  Hence the need for 
> > > > > some kind of kmap page pinning which can be used in any context, 
> > > > > including IRQ context.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> > > > > This is a RFC patch implementing the necessary part in the core code, as 
> > > > > suggested by RMK. Please comment.
> > > > 
> > > > I am not sure if i understand your concern totally.
> > > > I can understand it can be recycled. but Why is it racing ?
> > > 
> > > Suppose this sequence of events:
> > > 
> > > 	- dma_map_page(..., DMA_FROM_DEVICE) is called on a highmem page.
> > > 
> > > 	-->	- vaddr = page_address(page) is non null. In this case
> > > 		  it is likely that the page has valid cache lines
> > > 		  associated with vaddr. Remember that the cache is VIVT.
> > > 
> > > 		-->	- for (i = vaddr; i < vaddr + PAGE_SIZE; i += 32)
> > > 				invalidate_cache_line(i);
> > > 
> > > 	*** preemption occurs in the middle of the loop above ***
> > > 
> > > 	- kmap_high() is called for a different page.
> > > 
> > > 	-->	- last_pkmap_nr wraps to zero and flush_all_zero_pkmaps()
> > > 		  is called.  The pkmap_count value for the page passed
> > > 		  to dma_map_page() above happens to be 1, so it is 
> > > 		  unmapped.  But prior to that, flush_cache_kmaps() 
> > > 		  cleared the cache for it.  So far so good.
> > 
> > Thanks for kind explanation.:)
> > 
> > I thought kmap and dma_map_page usage was following.
> > 
> > kmap(page);
> > ...
> > dma_map_page(...)
> >   invalidate_cache_line
> > 
> > kunmap(page);
> 
> No, that's not the usage at all.  kmap() can't be called from the
> contexts which dma_map_page() is called from (iow, IRQ contexts as
> pointed out in the paragraph I underlined above.)
> 
> We're talking about dma_map_page() _internally_ calling kmap_get_page()
> to _atomically_ and _safely_ check whether the page was kmapped.  If
> it was kmapped, we need to pin the page and return its currently mapped
> address for cache handling and then release that reference.

Thanks, Russel. 
I see. That was thing I missed. :)

> None of the existing kmap support comes anywhere near to providing a
> mechanism for this because it can't be used in the contexts under which
> dma_map_page() is called.

Right. 

> If we could do it with existing interfaces, we wouldn't need a new
> interface would we?

OK. 
As previous said, I don't like kmap_high's irq disable.
It's already used in many place. so irq'disable effect might be rather big.

How about new interface which is like KM_IRQ's kmap_atomic slot 
 with serializing kmap_atomic_lock?

Let's Cced other experts. 

-- 
Kinds Regards
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/