[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903051542270.19207@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:44:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Rework disabling of interrupts during
suspend-resume
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> The following patches modifiy the way in which we handle disabling interrupts
> during suspend and enabling them during resume. They also change the ordering
> of the core suspend and hibernation code.
Side note - I've tested them on the EeePC that had trouble resuming due to
interrupt timings, and it suspends and resumes fine with these patches
(modulo some new X problems, but that's what I get for living with
Fedora-11 testing).
Of course, it also suspends and resumes without them, since the CPU "cli"
was sufficient for that machine, and it doesn't have any ACPI issues. But
it's still an ack that at least nothing breaks that I can tell.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists