[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1236334376.19146.11.camel@petitemort>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 10:12:56 +0000
From: Daniel Silverstone <dsilvers@...tec.co.uk>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Richard Hughes <hughsient@...il.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
toshiba_acpi@...ebeam.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
len.brown@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] toshiba_acpi: Add full hotkey support
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 10:09 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > How will it interact with software stacks like HAL when the lock button
> > > > is pressed?
> > > I don't really understand the question?
> > It was more: will events come out of both the notify method *and*
> > the /proc/acpi/toshiba/keys stuff, or will they only come out of the
> > notify method if it can be enabled? (I'm just trying to establish that
> > things polling /proc/acpi/toshiba/keys won't end up causing duplicated
> > events).
> Either the kernel or userspace will get the event, but not both. There's
> an argument for disabling the input code if /proc/acpi/toshiba/keys is
> open in order to avoid breaking anything that expects to get the code
> itself.
I see. One other thing occurred to me. Is there any way for Hal to know
that the notify stuff is in place and thus doesn't need to
poll /proc/acpi/toshiba/keys? Otherwise it's going to poll it anyway
which fails to remove the periodic wakeups.
D.
--
Daniel Silverstone http://www.simtec.co.uk/
PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 2BC8 4016 2068 7895
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists