[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200903061119.33023.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:19:29 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Rework disabling of interrupts during suspend-resume
On Friday 06 March 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > The following patches modifiy the way in which we handle disabling interrupts
> > during suspend and enabling them during resume. They also change the ordering
> > of the core suspend and hibernation code.
>
> Side note - I've tested them on the EeePC that had trouble resuming due to
> interrupt timings, and it suspends and resumes fine with these patches
> (modulo some new X problems, but that's what I get for living with
> Fedora-11 testing).
>
> Of course, it also suspends and resumes without them, since the CPU "cli"
> was sufficient for that machine, and it doesn't have any ACPI issues. But
> it's still an ack that at least nothing breaks that I can tell.
OK, thanks for testing! The next-step patches (ie. PCI suspend-resume rework)
are in the works.
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists