| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <49B0F9AF.7060800@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:23:43 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: introduce kfree_rcu V3
Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>>> This is one of patches I test kfree_rcu().
>>> And it could be an example conversions of this facility.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c | 14 +-----------
>>> block/genhd.c | 10 --------
>>> ipc/sem.c | 10 +-------
>>> kernel/audit_tree.c | 8 ------
>>> kernel/cgroup.c | 9 -------
>>> kernel/smp.c | 11 ---------
>>> mm/vmalloc.c | 18 +--------------
>>> net/can/af_can.c | 14 +-----------
>>> net/core/gen_estimator.c | 9 -------
>>> net/core/net_namespace.c | 10 --------
>>> net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 7 ------
>>> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 10 --------
>>> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.c | 8 ------
>>> net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 42 +-----------------------------------
>>> security/device_cgroup.c | 10 --------
>>> security/keys/keyring.c | 15 ------------
>>> security/keys/user_defined.c | 18 +--------------
>>> security/selinux/netif.c | 18 ---------------
>>> security/selinux/netnode.c | 20 +----------------
>>> security/selinux/netport.c | 20 +----------------
>>> 20 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 253 deletions(-)
>> Looks convincing to me but Nick does not like the extra SLAB
>> field it uses :-/
>
> FWIW, I'm fine with the patch series. One option for SLQB is to just
> remove slab coloring as I've suggested in the past (the performance
> benefit with current cpu caches is questionable).
>
> Pekka
>
>
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
There are 23 instances where the rcu callback just does
kfree(containerof(head,struct whatever_struct,rcu_member));
The 23 instances exist because there are 23 'struct whatever_struct' with
their individual rcu_member. These patches creates a generic kfree_rcu()
function that removes the need for these 23 helpers.
The number of this kind of rcu callback will increase, for this is the
most common way to use rcu and define rcu callback.
And kfree_rcu() is also help for unloadable modules, kfree_rcu() does not
queue any function which belong to the module, so a rcu_barrier() can
be avoid when module exit. (If we queue any other function by call_rcu(),
rcu_barrier() is still needed.)
Changed From V2:
Implement kfree_rcu() in rcu subsystem again.
The object pointer is stored in head->func instead of the
function pointer, and these rcu head(which are the same batch)
are queued in a list(per_cpu list). When a batch's grace period
is completed, the objects in this batch are freed, and then
we process the next batch(if next batch not empty).
Changlog V1 -> V2:
1) Implement kfree_rcu() in slab layer.
In V1, the offset from the container struct to the rcu member
is calculated at compile time and stored in head->func instead of the
function pointer. This disarrange rcu's algorithm a little, there is
no bad side effect when we implement kfree_rcu() in slab layer.
2) kfree_rcu() API is changed, use the version that Manfred Spraul designed.
This one allows compiler do more checking.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
index 24c5602..2a8d5a4 100644
--- a/include/linux/slab.h
+++ b/include/linux/slab.h
@@ -130,6 +130,20 @@ void kfree(const void *);
void kzfree(const void *);
size_t ksize(const void *);
+struct rcu_head;
+void __kfree_rcu(const void *, struct rcu_head *);
+
+/**
+ * kfree_rcu - kfree after a grace period
+ * @ptr: pointer to kfree
+ * @rcu_member: name of the struct rcu_head member.
+ *
+ * Many rcu callbacks just call kfree() on the base structure. This helper
+ * function calls kfree internally. The rcu_head structure must be embedded
+ * in the to be freed structure.
+ */
+#define kfree_rcu(ptr, rcu_member) __kfree_rcu((ptr), &(ptr)->rcu_member)
+
/*
* Allocator specific definitions. These are mainly used to establish optimized
* ways to convert kmalloc() calls to kmem_cache_alloc() invocations by
diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c
index d92a76a..753f10a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcupdate.c
+++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c
@@ -170,8 +170,91 @@ void rcu_barrier_sched(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_sched);
+struct kfree_rcu_cpuwork {
+ struct rcu_head rcu_head;
+ struct rcu_head *curr_head;
+ struct rcu_head *next_head, **next_tail;
+};
+
+static void kfree_rcu_advance_batch(struct kfree_rcu_cpuwork *work);
+
+static void kfree_rcu_batch_callback(struct rcu_head *rcu_head)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ struct rcu_head *list;
+ struct kfree_rcu_cpuwork *work = container_of(rcu_head,
+ struct kfree_rcu_cpuwork, rcu_head);
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ list = work->curr_head;
+ work->curr_head = NULL;
+ kfree_rcu_advance_batch(work);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+ while (list) {
+ struct rcu_head *next = list->next;
+ prefetch(next);
+ kfree((void *)(unsigned long)list->func);
+ list = next;
+ }
+}
+
+static void kfree_rcu_advance_batch(struct kfree_rcu_cpuwork *work)
+{
+ if (!work->curr_head && work->next_head) {
+ work->curr_head = work->next_head;
+ work->next_head = NULL;
+ work->next_tail = &work->next_head;
+
+ call_rcu(&work->rcu_head, kfree_rcu_batch_callback);
+ }
+}
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kfree_rcu_cpuwork, kfree_rcu_work);
+
+void __kfree_rcu(const void *obj, struct rcu_head *rcu)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ struct kfree_rcu_cpuwork *work;
+
+ rcu->func = (typeof(rcu->func))(unsigned long)obj;
+ rcu->next = NULL;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ work = &__get_cpu_var(kfree_rcu_work);
+ *work->next_tail = rcu;
+ work->next_tail = &rcu->next;
+ kfree_rcu_advance_batch(work);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kfree_rcu);
+
+static int __cpuinit kfree_rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
+ unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
+{
+ if (action == CPU_POST_DEAD) {
+ rcu_barrier();
+ rcu_barrier();
+ }
+ return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
+static void __init kfree_rcu_init(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ struct kfree_rcu_cpuwork *work;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ work = &per_cpu(kfree_rcu_work, cpu);
+ work->next_tail = &work->next_head;
+ }
+
+ hotcpu_notifier(kfree_rcu_cpu_notify, 0);
+}
+
void __init rcu_init(void)
{
+ kfree_rcu_init();
__rcu_init();
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists