[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49B10BA4.9070209@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:40:20 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: [PATCH -tip] sched: cleanup for TIF_NEED_RESCHED
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> Impact: cleanup
>>
>> use need_resched() instead of unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED))
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
>
> looks good - but it does not apply cleanly to the latest
> scheduler tree:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
>
> Could you please send a merged up patch and also make sure
> there's no other TIF_NEED_RESCHED usage in kernel/sched.c that
> could be converted to need_resched()?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>
>
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Impact: cleanup
Use test_tsk_need_resched(), set_tsk_need_resched(), need_resched()
instead of using TIF_NEED_RESCHED.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 63e8414..81b7c8b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1210,10 +1210,10 @@ static void resched_task(struct task_struct *p)
assert_spin_locked(&task_rq(p)->lock);
- if (unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_NEED_RESCHED)))
+ if (test_tsk_need_resched(p))
return;
- set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_NEED_RESCHED);
+ set_tsk_need_resched(p);
cpu = task_cpu(p);
if (cpu == smp_processor_id())
@@ -1269,7 +1269,7 @@ void wake_up_idle_cpu(int cpu)
* lockless. The worst case is that the other CPU runs the
* idle task through an additional NOOP schedule()
*/
- set_tsk_thread_flag(rq->idle, TIF_NEED_RESCHED);
+ set_tsk_need_resched(rq->idle);
/* NEED_RESCHED must be visible before we test polling */
smp_mb();
@@ -4795,12 +4795,11 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
asmlinkage void __sched schedule(void)
{
-need_resched:
- preempt_disable();
- __schedule();
- preempt_enable_no_resched();
- if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED)))
- goto need_resched;
+ do {
+ preempt_disable();
+ __schedule();
+ preempt_enable_no_resched();
+ } while (need_resched());
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(schedule);
@@ -4892,7 +4891,7 @@ asmlinkage void __sched preempt_schedule(void)
* between schedule and now.
*/
barrier();
- } while (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED)));
+ } while (need_resched());
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(preempt_schedule);
@@ -4921,7 +4920,7 @@ asmlinkage void __sched preempt_schedule_irq(void)
* between schedule and now.
*/
barrier();
- } while (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED)));
+ } while (need_resched());
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT */
diff --git a/lib/kernel_lock.c b/lib/kernel_lock.c
index 01a3c22..39f1029 100644
--- a/lib/kernel_lock.c
+++ b/lib/kernel_lock.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(kernel_flag);
int __lockfunc __reacquire_kernel_lock(void)
{
while (!_raw_spin_trylock(&kernel_flag)) {
- if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED))
+ if (need_resched())
return -EAGAIN;
cpu_relax();
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists