[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090306074548.36ed2f9f@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:45:48 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Andreas Robinson <andr345@...il.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, sam@...nborg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] module, kbuild: Faster boot with custom kernel.
On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:15:43 +0100
Andreas Robinson <andr345@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 16:18 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:47:10 +0100
> > Andreas Robinson <andr345@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > the only thing I can say (the graphs are a bit complex to read) is
> > that you are loading a LOT of very expensive modules that bring you
> > no functionality.
>
> Well, yes. It is the generic Ubuntu kernel booting in all its bloaty
> glory. :) But this is what most users are stuck with. The distro
> vendors won't change their ways because they want their stuff to run
> on anything.
the problem is that you are also having things that just don't make
sense; even for the generalized case...
but I guess that is for Ubuntu to resolve. I don't see the machines I
run (with Fedora) exhibit this same issue; while there are a bunch of
modules, none of the ones that are expensive-and-useless in your charts
are there.
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists