[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090306032122.GA32316@in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 08:51:22 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
andi@...stfloor.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com,
vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, arjan@...radead.org,
svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 4/4] timers: logic to enable timer migration.
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 05:23:29PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/04, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
> >
> > +++ linux.trees.git/kernel/sched.c
> > @@ -4009,6 +4009,11 @@ static struct {
> > .load_balancer = ATOMIC_INIT(-1),
> > };
> >
> > +inline int get_nohz_load_balancer(void)
>
> inline?
>
> > +{
> > + return atomic_read(&nohz.load_balancer);
> > +}
>
> Shouldn't we reset .load_balancer when this CPU is CPU_DOWN'ed ?
> Otherwise the timer can migrate to the dead CPU.
In the select_nohz_load_balancer() code, we check if this CPU is in the
cpu_active_map. If no, then this CPU relinquishes being the idle
load balancer. Also, the timer migration code in the CPU down path would
migrate any timers queued onto this CPU, right ?
>
> Oleg.
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists