[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090306194045.GE3712@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:40:45 -0500
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@...nwrt.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 6 (ath9k)
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 11:41:02AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Gabor Juhos wrote:
> > Randy Dunlap írta:
> >> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Linus' release of -rc7 seems to have stirred people up a bit ...
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20090305:
> >>
> >> when CONFIG_RFKILL=n, ath9k/virtual.c causes:
> >>
> >> (.text+0x224e83): undefined reference to `ath_radio_disable'
> >> (.text+0x224e8b): undefined reference to `ath_radio_enable'
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have submitted a patch for this already:
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=123633468314970&w=2
> >
> > Should I send it to somewhere else as well?
>
> It hasn't propagated into the linux-next merging yet...
He just sent it today (or overnight). I'll get it into wireless-next.
John
P.S. I'm starting to think that RFKILL should just be mandatory...
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@...driver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists