[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090306143816.ed70f0e1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:38:16 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
Cc: alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vapier.adi@...il.com, cooloney@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/18] Blackfin Serial Driver: explain why we cannot
cpu_relax() in early serial code
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:42:48 +0800
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/serial/bfin_5xx.c | 4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/serial/bfin_5xx.c b/drivers/serial/bfin_5xx.c
> index 5a163f6..de8709d 100644
> --- a/drivers/serial/bfin_5xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/serial/bfin_5xx.c
> @@ -1190,6 +1190,10 @@ static __init void early_serial_putc(struct uart_port *port, int ch)
> unsigned timeout = 0xffff;
> struct bfin_serial_port *uart = (struct bfin_serial_port *)port;
>
> + /* We cannot cpu_relax() here as doing so on the BF561 relies
> + * on the per-cpu region being setup, and since this is early
> + * serial code, it may not yet be usable ...
> + */
> while ((!(UART_GET_LSR(uart) & THRE)) && --timeout)
> barrier();
Again: this is blackfin core breakage.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists